Adele is “Rolling In The Deep”, new single is major!

Adele is “Rolling In The Deep”, new single is major!

Whoa, Adele has returned and to no surprise she has NOT let us down! “Rolling In The Deep” is a triumph in every sense of the word, it’s real and raw, it’s emotional and so felt, and it’s here for your listening pleasure! “Rolling In The Deep” is the lead single for the sophomore album from Adele properly titled 21. Dropping on January 24th in the UK and on February 22nd in the US.

Adele — Rolling In The Deep

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Below: An accompanying video of sorts if you fancy!

This entry was posted in POP Preview and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Adele is “Rolling In The Deep”, new single is major!

  1. Sara says:

    Adele’s 19 was strong. 21 is simply timeless. In the past two years, Adele has refined and reinvented her unique sound that always puts her aching yet powerful vocals and lyrics at the forefront. These are songs that could have been released in the 60s as easily as 30 years from now. Adele has injected her trademark piano ballads with the best from several different musical genres including Americana roots and country, r&b, blues and gospel. The music is exciting and simply is. It lives, breathes. I played a couple songs for my mom, who at forty years older than I, generally criticizes my music taste, and the first thing she said was “Wow, this girl really knows how to write a story–those songs are beautiful.”

    Sara @
    laptop.data@aol.com” rel=”nofollow”>

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Name

Website

Comment

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=”” title=””> <abbr title=””> <acronym title=””> <b> <blockquote cite=””> <cite> <code> <del datetime=””> <em> <i> <q cite=””> <strike> <strong>

]]>

Compression Plugin made by Web Hosting

Comments

comments

Instagram did not return a 200.